Table 2.
SNP Association in GWAS dataset | SNP functional prioritization | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||
SNP | Role | A1 | F_A | F_U | A2 | P | OR | L95 | U95 | Proxy SNP ID | Proxy SNP function | * r2 | RegPotential Score | Conservation Score |
rs118727 | intergenic | C | 0.14 | 0.12 | T | 0.0026 | 1.18 | 1.06 | 1.32 | rs3761 | NEFL/3′-UTR | 1 | 0.21 | 0.132 |
rs196830 | intergenic | C | 0.15 | 0.12 | A | 0.0012 | 1.19 | 1.07 | 1.33 | rs3761 | NEFL/3′-UTR | 1 | 0.21 | 0.132 |
rs169061 | intergenic | C | 0.40 | 0.43 | T | 0.0008 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.95 | ^ no-LD | - | - | - | - |
rs11994014 | Downstream | A | 0.20 | 0.22 | G | 0.0368 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 0.99 | ° rs2979704 and rs1059111 | NEFL/3′-UTR | 0.63 | 0.07 and 0.36 | 0.96 and 1.00 |
rs2979685 | Promoter | T | 0.36 | 0.36 | G | 0.8723 | 1.01 | 0.93 | 1.09 | - | - | - | - | - |
rs17830286 | Promoter | T | 0.16 | 0.15 | C | 0.0085 | 1.15 | 1.04 | 1.27 | rs3761 | NEFL/3′-UTR | 0.64 | 0.21 | 0.132 |
rs13254844 | Promoter | T | 0.05 | 0.05 | C | 0.5270 | 0.95 | 0.80 | 1.12 | - | - | - | - | - |
rs17830392 | Promoter | G | 0.08 | 0.07 | A | 0.2101 | 1.09 | 0.95 | 1.26 | - | - | - | - | - |
A1: minor allele; A2: major allele; F_A: minor allele frequency in cases; F_U: minor allele frequency in controls
OR: odds ratio; L95: lower bound of 95% confidence interval for odds ratio; U95: upper bound of 95% confidence interval for odds ratio
Cut-off = 0.60
rs2979704 and rs1059111 are in strong LD (r2=1)
No SNP was found in LD with r2>0.60
RegPotential: regulatory potential score (ESPERR regulatory potential based on 7 species) downloaded from UCSC genome bioinformatics web site
Conservation: vertebrate Multiz Alignment and Conservation score (17 Species) downloaded from UCSC genome website