Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 28;15(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12859-014-0381-3

Table 2.

Comparison of average sensitivity for various contig assembly tools

Tool Closest reference Top 10 Top 20
CAR (PROmer) 62.71 (67.50) 49.87 (56.25) 37.33 (32.25)
SIS (PROmer) 60.82 (67.50) 48.53 (54.55) 36.14 (30.40)
Mauve Aligner 60.19 (65.22) 46.40 (46.88) 32.86 (22.47)
r2cat 61.64 (78.13) 43.56 (38.52) 30.01 (20.51)
CAR (NUCmer) 57.04 (73.68) 43.38 (39.01) 28.19 (7.41)
SIS (NUCmer) 55.41 (72.73) 42.70 (36.67) 27.56 (6.40)
OSLay 48.38 (62.50) 34.43 (12.90) 21.18 (0.60)
fillScaffolds (NUCmer) 49.04 (56.41) 34.23 (21.83) 21.36 (4.53)
fillScaffolds (PROmer) 45.19 (50.00) 33.18 (25.93) 21.76 (8.75)
CONTIGuator 45.66 (50.00) 31.53 (15.43) 19.29 (0.68)
Projector2 42.58 (40.17) 29.18 (20.49) 18.63 (5.00)
ABACAS 33.42 (28.57) 23.64 (0.38) 13.01 (0.00)

This table is sorted in descending order according to the average values shown in the “Top 10” column, where the values in parentheses are medians.