Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 28;15(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12859-014-0381-3

Table 3.

Comparison of average precision for various contig assembly tools

Tool Closest reference Top 10 Top 20
CAR (PROmer) 68.50 (73.91) 56.54 (66.04) 43.30 (40.00)
SIS (PROmer) 66.47 (73.91) 54.96 (60.00) 41.84 (38.98)
CAR (NUCmer) 63.71 (81.25) 51.49 (56.25) 35.36 (22.22)
SIS (NUCmer) 61.99 (76.92) 50.54 (56.25) 34.36 (20.99)
OSLay 61.86 (75.00) 49.57 (59.41) 38.00 (33.33)
r2cat 65.59 (79.17) 48.38 (48.61) 34.91 (26.67)
Mauve Aligner 60.19 (65.22) 46.41 (46.88) 32.88 (22.47)
CONTIGuator 58.95 (66.67) 41.83 (42.33) 28.23 (11.11)
Projector2 57.85 (64.29) 41.63 (37.50) 29.04 (20.00)
fillScaffolds (NUCmer) 54.50 (59.26) 40.34 (30.88) 26.57 (12.40)
fillScaffolds (PROmer) 48.79 (51.46) 37.14 (29.15) 24.67 (12.50)
ABACAS 46.88 (50.00) 31.54 (14.29) 20.43 (0.00)

This table is sorted in descending order according to the average values displayed in the “Top 10” column, where the values in parentheses are medians.