Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 18;14:189. doi: 10.1186/s12876-014-0189-7

Table 4.

Means for the assessment of intestinal permeability (functional tests, bacteria-related tests)

Means Hu An Test molecules Test site Material needed Disadvantages
Ex vivo
Ussing chamber x x H2O, ions, sugars etc., site specific biopsies invasive
In vivo – permeability assays
Lactulose/mannitol x x oligosaccharides of different MW small intestine urine time consuming
Sucralose x (x) sucralose(comb.)* colon urine time consuming
Sucrose x (x) sucrose(comb.)* stomach urine time consuming
PEG4000/400 x (x) polyethylene glycols whole intestine urine time consuming
51Cr-EDTA x x 51Cr-EDTA whole intestine urine radio-activity
In vivo – bacteria-related
LAL assay x x endotoxin (LPS) whole intestine plasma assay limitation
EndoCAb x x anti-LPS antibodies whole intestine serum only in acute phase
D-lactate x x bacterial lactate whole intestine plasma low specificity
Butyrate production x x BPB (PCR) colon feces special labs, limited data
Hemolysin test x x pathogens (cell culture) colon feces special labs, limited data
Inner colon mucus x x quantification of bacteria colon biopsies invasive,limited standardization
Liver steatosis x x fat content in the liver whole intestine MRT, US expensive unspecific
Breath tests x x fat content in the liver whole intestine GC/MS unclear specificity

Abbreviations: Hu suitable for the human system, An suitable for animal models, 51Cr-EDTA chromium labeled EDTA, BPB butyrate-producing bacteria, EndoCAb circulating endotoxin core antibodies, GC gas chromatography, LAL limulus amebocyte lysate assay, LPS lipopolysaccharide, MRT magnetic resonance tomography, MS mass spectroscopy, PEG polyethylene glycols, US ultrasound. *in combination with Lactulose/mannitol test.