Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2014 Sep 10;275:212–218. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.09.006

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Goal-tracking time (s) during each postshift trial (4% sucrose) was subtracted from the goal-tracking time (s) of each animal in its last preshift trial (32% sucrose) in downshifted animals from the three classes of recovery identified. The classes (percentage of total sample) were labeled according to their postshift performance: Recovery (83%), No Recovery (11%), and No Contrast (6%). The sample size for each class was 217, 30, and 15 animals, respectively. Change scores are estimated means derived from the latent growth mixture model.