Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Eye Res. 2014 Oct 5;128:129–140. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.08.016

Table 5.

FRAP half time to recovery data

Control GA GA + GL
Location N N N
All 3 zones 57 2.21 ± 1.22 30 2.65 ± 1.30* 30 2.56 ± 1.54
Peripapillary 20 3.33 ± 1.01 10 3.65 ± 1.30^ 10 4.19 ± 1.56^
0.75 mm 20 1.52 ± 0.42 10 2.09 ± 0.62 10 1.51 ± 0.56
1.50 mm 20 1.81 ± 1.01 10 2.52 ± 1.36 10 2.23 ± 0.82
*

difference from control: p = 0.001;

difference from control: p = 0.24;

GA= glyceraldehyde; GL= glaucoma induced via bead model;

difference of control peripapillary from other two control zones both p < 0.001;

^

difference from control of GA and GA+GL in peripapillary area, p = 0.20 and 0.049, respectively. N= samples per group, t½ in minutes; mean ± standard deviation.