. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: Schizophr Res. 2014 Sep 19;159(0):278–283. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.08.008

Table 2.

Disorganized communication as a predictor of psychosis onset

	n	Survival	Binomial classification
	n	HR (95% CI)	PPV	NPV	Sensitivity	Specificity
Baseline
Disorganized communication, 1+	83	2.15 (0.51–9.09)	.29	.88	.92	.19
Disorganized communication, 2+	66	2.73 (1.03–7.27)	.33	.85	.81	.38
Disorganized communication, 3+	44	2.63 (1.18–5.85)	.36	.82	.62	.62
Disorganized communication, 4+	22	2.43 (1.04–5.69)	.36	.77	.31	.81
Disorganized communication, 5+	7	2.47 (0.84–7.27)	.57	.76	.15	.96
Trajectories
Disorganized communication, elevated	44	2.23 (1.01–4.93)	.34	.80	.58	.61

Note: Bold indicates significant hazard ratio by Cox regression, p<0.05.

PPV = positive predictive value

NPV = negative predictive value