Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e113319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113319

Table 4. Summary of different assays performed in the experiment and the results obtained in each of the groups.

Experimental set-up Tests Gr. A Gr. B Gr. C MSC only
2D or indirect culture Alamar blue, ALP assay, RT-PCR of osteogenic markers No difference
RT-PCR of VEGF No difference Increased No difference
3D or direct culture Alamar blue, ALP assay, SEM or cell attachment No difference
Cu2+ quantification + +++
Group I Group II Group III Group IV Group V
2D indirect assay with both MSCs and ECs Matrigel assay with the end-of-time cells All shows positive tube formation.
Light microscopy Tube-like formation
Flow cytometry for VWF Wk 1∶77%; Wk 2∶60.3% Wk 1∶92.5%, Wk 2∶95.1%
Flow cytometry for KDR Wk 1∶34%, Wk 2∶16.5% Wk 1∶66%, Wk 2∶47%
Flow cytometry for CD 31 Wk 1∶90%, Wk 2∶97.3% Wk 1∶95.5%, Wk 2∶98%
Acetylated LDL uptake + + + + +
VEGF in media ++ ++
Cu2+ quantification + +

(Kindly refer the text for details).