Table 4. Summary of different assays performed in the experiment and the results obtained in each of the groups.
Experimental set-up | Tests | Gr. A | Gr. B | Gr. C | MSC only | |
2D or indirect culture | Alamar blue, ALP assay, RT-PCR of osteogenic markers | No difference | ||||
RT-PCR of VEGF | No difference | Increased | No difference | |||
3D or direct culture | Alamar blue, ALP assay, SEM or cell attachment | No difference | ||||
Cu2+ quantification | – | + | +++ | – | ||
Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV | Group V | ||
2D indirect assay with both MSCs and ECs | Matrigel assay with the end-of-time cells | All shows positive tube formation. | ||||
Light microscopy | Tube-like formation | |||||
Flow cytometry for VWF | Wk 1∶77%; Wk 2∶60.3% | Wk 1∶92.5%, Wk 2∶95.1% | ||||
Flow cytometry for KDR | Wk 1∶34%, Wk 2∶16.5% | Wk 1∶66%, Wk 2∶47% | ||||
Flow cytometry for CD 31 | Wk 1∶90%, Wk 2∶97.3% | Wk 1∶95.5%, Wk 2∶98% | ||||
Acetylated LDL uptake | + | + | + | + | + | |
VEGF in media | – | – | – | ++ | ++ | |
Cu2+ quantification | – | – | + | – | + |
(Kindly refer the text for details).