Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2014 Feb 15;13(5):1041–1051. doi: 10.1007/s10237-014-0553-0

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Mechanical responses of the femoral and carotid arteries evaluated at their respective in vivo axial stretches. A Pressure–diameter relationships. The diameters are normalized to each corresponding zero-pressure, in vivo axial stretch values (*P < 0.05). B Local compliance differences assessed at increments of 20 mmHg (*P < 0.05). C Mean circumferential (hoop stress) and pressure relationships. Means were not found to be significantly different. D Mean axial stress and pressure relationships. Significances between mean axial stresses were found at all pressures