Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 16;117(11):1388–1397. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00109.2013

Table 3.

Effect of region, ankle angle, and force on fascicle sheet curvature

LG
MG
Soleus
κfsc, m−1 βfsc κfsc, m−1 βfsc κfsc, m−1 βfsc
Medial 2.09 (0.80) 86.64 (2.30) 7.72 (2.18) 102.41 (7.64) 5.5 (3.07) 84.76 (4.39)
Lateral 3.54 (1.05) 88.39 (3.58) 3.64 (0.67) 105.00 (5.10) 7.25 (4.93) 92.61 (6.84)
−15° 2.50 (0.83) 86.11 (2.11) 5.23 (1.26) 110.52 (9.70) 6.74 (8.05) 90.73 (3.00)
2.18 (0.67) 88.79 (2.24) 5.08 (1.21) 101.8 (13.10) 5.63 (3.72) 89.64 (4.46)
15° 2.78 (1.26) 87.71 (3.08) 6.01 (1.89) 101.31 (11.28) 6.39 (5.20) 88.63 (4.25)
30° 3.44 (1.12) 86.98 (4.81) 6.50 (0.99) 100.63 (5.10) 7.24 (9.52) 89.29 (7.86)
0% 2.72 (0.58) 88.88 (1.74) 5.54 (1.05) 105.35 (9.44) 6.05 (4.70) 89.56 (5.39)
30% 2.88 (0.74) 87.37 (2.54) 5.87 (1.13) 98.41 (6.04) 4.23 (2.39) 88.00 (9.57)
60% 2.57 (0.90) 86.34 (1.34) 5.75 (1.73) 107.53 (8.01) 9.65 (9.79) 91.26 (4.06)

Values reported are mean (SD; n = 6 participants values of fascicle sheet curvature magnitude (κfsc) and azimuthal angle (φfsc).