Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e114237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114237

Figure 9. The impact of spatial extent of excitation and inhibition on the distribution of F2 components.

Figure 9

Same illustration as in Fig. 4, for simulations with different extents of excitatory and inhibitory connectivity. (A) shows the results for a network with inhibition being more localized than excitation (Inline graphic and Inline graphic). In (B) we show the results for excitation being more localized than inhibition (Inline graphic and Inline graphic). Other parameters are the same as in Fig. 6. The distribution of F2 components is computed after re-normalization of the connectivity matrix by Inline graphic, as explained before.