Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 19;99(12):E2709–E2714. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2494

Table 2.

Pros and Cons of Empiric Sulfonylurea Trial Before Genetic Testing Results Are Available

Pro Con
May ameliorate neurodevelopmental disability in some cases Inappropriately high family expectations leading to disappointment (and possibility of increased cost) if attempt fails
Could shorten inpatient stay Molecular diagnosis may guide treatment based on reported sulfonylurea response in patients with identical mutation
If successful, will reduce overall treatment costs Risk of hypoglycemia during transition and in those with transient forms of NDM
Much easier to give pills than insulin Sulfonylurea is not approved by FDA for use in infants (also the case for many forms of insulin)
Safety profile of sulfonylurea use in children remains excellent to date Unknown long-term risks of sulfonylurea use
Genetic testing approval, results, and/or interpretation could cause delay Second attempt needed if initial trial fails but genetic testing reveals a KCNJ11 or ABCC8 mutation