Table 7.
Summary of articles in category “educational research or evaluation”
| Reference | Focus of evaluation | Learning assessment | Result |
| Bednarski et al., 2005 | Student learning and attitudes | Group quiz and a pretest and posttest assessment | Students gained understanding of the Web-based databases and tools and enjoyed of the investigatory nature of the lab |
| Brame et al., 2008 | Student knowledge and skills and interest in research | Pretest and posttest assessments and student laboratory reports scored with a rubric | Student response to the project was positive, both in terms of knowledge and skills increases and interest in research |
| Brazeau and Brazeau, 2006 | Student perceptions | Significant improvement on student course ratings on the pedagogical format of the course and the relevance of course material to professional practice | |
| Campbell, 2003 | Student academic achievement and perceptions | Course examinations | Students gained the ability to utilize online information to achieve the educational goals of the course and perceived this as a positive experience with respect to how they might contribute to biology |
| Furge et al., 2009 | Student learning strategies and learning | Student laboratory reports, solutions to problem sets, and in-class presentations | Largely promotion of active learning in the classrooms and enhanced student understanding of course materials |
| Honts, 2003 | Student learning | A take-home final examination | Students developed working knowledge of bioinformatics concepts and methods |
| Howard et al., 2007 | Student confidence and performance | Students gained confidence in solving and ability to solve bioinformatics-related problems. Increased student performance on bioinformatics-related problems | |
| Howard et al., 2007 | Faculty perceptions of students’ increased awareness | Faculty members perceived an increased awareness of the applications of bioinformatics among the students in their courses | |
| Krilowicz et al., 2007 | Instructor and student self-reported required prior knowledge and skills | Identified skills and knowledge from the fields of computer science, biology, and mathematics that are critical for students considering bioinformatics research | |
| Lim et al., 2003 | Student perceptions | The course was rated as informative, interactive, and effective for distance learning. Participants expressed that the course content was useful and well presented with good technical support | |
| Lim et al., 2009 | Student perceptions | Identified a positive response regarding the usefulness of an e-learning tool in guiding the learning and discussion process involved in problem-based learning and enhanced the learning experience by breaking down PBL activities into a sequential workflow | |
| Machluf et al., 2013 | Teachers’ design of an assessment tool as a means of probing their knowledge and beliefs in adopting contemporary scientific research into their classroom | The analysis of the assessment tool revealed that teachers perceived research as combining laboratory experiments and bioinformatics approaches. Thus, the assessment tool represented characteristics of authentic modern scientific research and the teachers’ appropriation of the new bioinformatics curriculum by extending its roots into the traditional curriculum | |
| Medin and Nolin, 2011 | Student self-assessment of their learning gains | Students reflected that the design aspect of the experiments increased their understanding and retention of molecular biology | |
| Obom and Cummings, 2009 | Compared student onsite and online learning and satisfaction | Course examinations | Perceived similar levels of satisfaction between most online and on-site student responses, obtained similar performance in grades earned by students in online and on-site courses, and perceived more rigorous course load and more opportunities for participation in online environment |
| Robertson and Phillips, 2008 | Learning goals and assessments of student performance and perceptions | Pretest and posttest assessments, with instructor rubric to report perceived student learning | Students were more poised to troubleshoot problems that arose in real experiments. Students were receptive to the new materials and the majority achieved the learning goals |
| Shachak et al., 2005 | Faculty curriculum design activities | Identified that Gagne's conditions of learning instructional design theory provides a useful framework for developing bioinformatics training, but may not be optimal as a method for teaching it | |
| Van Mulligen et al., 2008 | Faculty curriculum design activities | Participants indicated that the training challenge experience had contributed to their understanding and appreciation of multidisciplinary teamwork | |
| Wefer and Sheppard, 2008 | Science standards as related to bioinformatics | Identified a generally low representation of bioinformatics-related content in science standards | |
| Yang et al., 2008 | Student stimulation to learn | Increased stimulation on students’ activities in bioinformatics learning based on proper application-oriented bioinformatics curriculum and student-centered instructional strategy |