Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Biomater. 2014 Oct 5;11:283–294. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.046

Table 1.

Of the many parameters that can modulate the host inflammatory response to a fibrous scaffold, we first reduced an initial set of 20 (listed in the left column) to a focused set of 10 (highlighted in grey), which in turn was reduced to a final set of 6 (in bold) parameters that were used for non-dimensionalization (cf. Table 2) and the subsequent computational study. References for each parameter are classified as (i) from the general biomaterials literature or specific to vascular applications, and (ii) by the experiments performed in vitro versus in vivo, which in turn were either sub-cutaneous (SQ) or tissue specific (TS). Note that review articles are only classified by (i).

Parameters General
Biomaterials
Vascular
Specific
In vitro In vivo
(SQ)
In
vivo
(TS)
Chemical side groups 53,56 12,15 53 53
Composition 11 15,54 11,54 11 54
Contact duration 18,53,55,56 15 18,53 53,55
Filament structure 63 63 63
Host-dependencies 53 12 53 53
Material weight 64 64
Morphology 9,28 15 28 9,28
pH end products 63 64 63 63 64
Sterility 15
Topography 11,26,28,62 15,54 11,26,28,54 11,28 54
Roughness 11,26,62 15 11,26 11
Shape 9,26,53 15 26,53 9,53
Surface chemistry 11,43,55,62,63 12,15,54,61,65 11,43,54,61,63,65 11,55,61,63 54
Wettability 9,11 12,15,61 11,61 9,11,61
Degradation rate 9,53 12,15,57 53 9,53 57
Porosity 9,20,53,55,58–60 15,54,61 20,53,54,58,60,61 9,53,55,59,61 54
Stiffness 53,66 12,15,54,67,68 53,66,67 53 54,6 8
Fiber diameter 10,18,24,25,26,28,43,60,63,69 12,17,46,65,67 17,18,25,26,28,43,46,60,63,65,67 10,24,28,63,69 46
Pore size 10,18,20,24,45,53,58–60 12,46,61,67 18,20,46,53,58,60,61,67 1,450,24,53,59,61
Alignment 11,26,28 12 11,26,28 11,28