Table 1.

Summary of Articles on State-Level Dependent Coverage Expansions

	MCDB (2011)		LMH (2011)			Depew (2013)
Article Model	1	2	1	2	3	1
Dataset	CPS ASEC	CPS ASEC	CPS ASEC	CPS ASEC	CPS ASEC	SIPP
Survey years	2001–2009	2001–2009	2001–2009	2001–2009	2001–2009	2001, 2004, 2008 panels
Sample	Ages 19–29	Ages 19–25	Ages 19–24	Ages 19–24 and “eligible”	Ages 19–24	Females ages 19–25
Insurance outcome	Employer-sponsored dependent	Employer-sponsored dependent	Private insurance coverage	Private insurance coverage	Private insurance coverage	Dependent coverage (parental)
Model	“difference-in-differences”	“difference-in-differences”	“difference-in-difference”	“difference-in-difference”	“triple-difference” (difference-in-difference-in-differences)	“difference-in-difference-in-difference”
Treatment group	Target population in pre- or postreform states	Target population in pre- or postreform state	Individuals in postreform states	Eligible individuals in postreform states	Eligible individuals in reform states	Eligible individuals in reform or prereform states
Control group	Nontarget individuals in prereform or reform states, and all individuals in nonreform states	Nontarget individuals in prereform or reform states, and all individuals in nonreform states	Individuals in prereform or nonreform states	Eligible individuals in prereform states and unmarried individuals in nonreform states	Eligible individuals in prereform states, unmarried individuals in nonreform states, and ineligible individuals in reform states	Noneligible individuals in pre- or postreform states, eligible and ineligible individuals in nonreform states
Predictor variable	TARGET × POLICY	TARGET × POLICY	LAW	LAW	LAW × ELIGIBLE	LAW × ELIGIBLE
Effect (coefficient, SE)	1.52 (0.69)** [percentage points]	2.77 (0.81)*** [percentage points]	0.010 (0.007)	0.022 (0.007)**	0.044 (0.010)**	Females: 0.0571 (0.0093)***; Males: 0.0299 (0.0092)***

^***p <. 01;

^**p <. 05.