Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 12;2(6):734–743. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.128

Table 2.

Box–Behnken optimization design and measured response.

Trial no. Factor
Response OD6001
X1/(x1) X2/(x2) X3/(x3)
1 5/(+1)2 10/(+1) 42/(0) 26.70
2 2.5/(0) 5/(0) 42/(0) 24.70
3 5/(+1) 5/(0) 60/(+1) 35.60
4 2.5/(0) 0/(−1) 24/(−1) 10.20
5 2.5/(0) 5/(0) 42/(0) 23.20
6 2.5/(0) 10/(+1) 60/(+1) 33.30
7 0/(−1) 0/(−1) 42/(0) 10.50
8 2.5/(0) 0/(−1) 60/(+1) 21.20
9 2.5/(0) 5/(0) 42/(0) 20.50
10 0/(−1) 5/(0) 24/(−1) 12.10
11 0/(−1) 10/(+1) 42/(0) 16.20
12 2.5/(0) 10/(+1) 24/(−1) 13.75
13 5/(+1) 5/(0) 24/(−1) 14.65
14 5/(+1) 0/(−1) 42/(0) 11.40
15 2.5/(0) 5/(0) 42/(0) 24.00
16 0/(−1) 5/(0) 60/(+1) 22.20

X1 = (NH4)2SO4 (g·L−1);X2 = CMz (g·L−1);X3 = time (h).

1

Data represent the average ± SD of three independent experiment.

2

Numbers between brackets are the coded values of the variables.