Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 20;78(6):1201–1216. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12398

Table 4.

Type of patient participation and evaluation in medication reviews – qualitative studies

Reference Type of communication and by whom Information given by patient to professional Consultation by professional Process or evaluation outcomes Quality assessment
Sheridan et al. 45 Interview in pharmacy by pharmacist
  1. Actual drug use

  2. Adherence

  3. Side effects

  4. Effectiveness

  5. Storage

  6. Use of equipment

Education
  1. All but one patient were happy with the home visit

  2. Nearly all respondents felt that they had enough time to discuss relevant questions, and were responded adequately

  3. Patients did not report specific health gains directly from the MUR. However, knowledge and comfortable to discuss health or medication issues in the future with pharmacists were mentioned

  4. Pharmacists did believe that the MUR could have improved outcomes for patients

  5. The consultation lasted <30 min–1 h

Strong
Latif et al. 32 Home visits by pharmacist
  1. Actual drug use

  2. Medication knowledge

Education
  1. 40–60% of the patients did not ask any questions during the MUR

  2. Little room for open questions, OTC discussion offered more scope for participation

Strong
Bissel et al. 52 Consultation with pharmacist
  1. Actual drug use

  2. Compliance

  3. Lifestyle and social support

Not described
  1. Majority expressed ambivalent views about the service, overall cautiously more positive than negative

  2. Helpful reassurance on illness and therapy

  3. Positive about the consultation with the pharmacist but reservations about them making recommendations. Many regard the doctor as the health professional in charge.

  4. Patient felt more knowledgeable on their medicines

Strong
Salter et al. 42 Home visits by pharmacist
  1. Actual drug use

Advice, information, and instruction on medicines
  1. Advice was often resisted or rejected and created interactional difficulties and awkward moments

  2. Almost no patient initiated requests for advice or information

  3. Calling on the higher authority of the doctor was prevalent

  4. Consultation time: mean 45 min

Strong
Petty et al. 40 Interview in clinic by clinical pharmacist
  1. Actual drug use

  2. Medication issues

Explanation, not further defined
  1. Some patients welcomed the opportunity to have questions answered

  2. Health care professionals must judge who needs more detailed information and who does not

  3. Not everybody accepted the advice given by the pharmacist

Strong
Chen et al. 18 Interview in pharmacy by clinical pharmacist
  1. Effectiveness perception

  2. Side effects

  3. Adherence

Not described
  1. Better understanding of patient's perspective, would facilitate concordance

  2. Consultation duration ranged from 15–90 min

Moderate
Nathan et al. 35 Interview in pharmacy by pharmacist
  1. Actual drug use

Not described
  1. Expression of satisfaction and gratitude

  2. Better understanding of medicines

  3. Re-assurement (for patients) that they were taking medicines correctly

  4. Learning things about medications that they not knew before

Strong

OTC, over the counter medicines; MUR, medication use review.