Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 5;8:989. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00989

Table 2.

Partial correlations with ride frequency.

Ride frequency
Sample post-RCTa (n = 30) Excluding outlier (n = 29)
r p r p
Demographics
MCI classification 0.18 0.38 0.13 0.54
Physical illness scale 0.08 0.69 0.06 0.77
Executive function
Stroop C-A (prior intervention change: post-pre)b 0.38 0.05 0.43 0.03
Exercise attitudes
Exercise benefits and barriers scale (benefits) −0.28 0.16 −0.15 0.47
Exercise benefits and barriers scale (barriers) 0.37 0.06 0.37 0.07
Social support for exercise scale (family) −0.10 0.62 −0.11 0.59
Social support for exercise scale (friends) 0.03 0.89 −0.05 0.81
Self-efficacy physical activity scale (total) 0.52 0.01 0.42 0.04
Motivation for physical activity measure (enjoy) −0.15 0.48 −0.20 0.33
Motivation for physical activity measure (appearance) −0.41 0.04 −0.55 0.004
Motivation for physical activity measure (fitness) 0.00 1.00 0.01 0.98
Motivation to exercise for cognitive benefit 0.35 0.08 0.32 0.12

Note. Control variables included: group, age, education, and prior executive function (at enrollment).

aThe “Sample post-RCT” refers to those who completed the original RCT and the follow-up (even if they had zero rides).

bUsed change in difference score formula consistent with Best et al. (2014).