Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 5;8:405. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00405

Table 3.

One-way ANOVA results of mean scores obtained by participants divided into the three groups at the EF tasks.

EF test Group Post-hoc comparisons
PD-NC PD-MCI CG F p ηp2 PD-NC vs. CG PD-NC vs. PD-MCI CG vs. PD-MCI
Clock drawing test 9.3 (0.8) 7.6 (2.2) 9.8 (0.2) 9.8 *** 0.347 N.S. ** ***
Phonological verbal fluency 32.9 (8.5) 22.7 (10.1) 50.1 (8.5) 34.7 *** 0.629 *** * ***
Semantic verbal fluency 43.5 (9.2) 33.2 (8.0) 53.4 (7.8) 21.8 *** 0.516 ** ** ***
Tower of London test 23 (5.0) 15.5 (5.0) 26.4 (4.6) 16.5 *** 0.441 N.S. *** ***

Values are shown as mean (SD).

p values: *** <0.001, ** <0.01, * <0.05, N.S. = Nonsignificant.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure