Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 5;8:405. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00405

Table 4.

One-way ANOVA results of mean scores obtained by participants divided into the three groups at the VMET.

VMET scores Group Post-hoc comparisons
PD-NC PD-MCI CG F p ηp2 PD-NC vs. CG PD-NC vs. PD-MCI CG vs. PD-MCI
Time (seconds) 1110 (600) 1223 (579) 727 (308) 3.8 * 0.347 N.S. N.S. *
Task failure 22.3 (4.2) 22.8 (5.2) 14.3 (2.3) 20.2 *** 0.491 *** N.S. ***
Inefficiencies 22.3 (4.3) 18.6 (4.0) 24.2 (8.1) 3.6 * 0.146 N.S. N.S. *
Strategies 40.5 (8.7) 43.6 (7.4) 32.2 (5.3) 9.8 *** 0.319 ** N.S. ***
Rule breaks 23.2 (7.0) 21.9 (5.1) 23.6 (7.0) 0.324 N.S 0.015 N.S. N.S. N.S
Interpretation failures 5 (0.8) 5.07 (1.0) 4.47 (0.8) 1.9 N.S 0.086 N.S. N.S. N.S.

Values are shown as mean (SD).

p values: *** <0.001, ** <0.01, * <0.05, N.S. = Nonsignificant.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure