Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 5;9(12):e113515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113515

Table 2. Feeding and filter details for the three freshwater aquaria with controlled nitrogen budgets.

Aquarium code Fish wet weight (g) Biofilter volume (L) Biofilter hydraulic residence time (s) Upflow velocity (m/h) Carrier material Fish feed Protein content (%) Scenario 1 (days 0-21) Scenario 2 (days 22-end)
Feed dose (mg d−1) Loading rate (mg N L−1 d−1) min - max Feed dose (mg d−1) Loading rate (mg N L−1 d−1) min - max
F4 239 15 56 27 t: fine sponge b:rough sponge Tetra Cichlid flakes 48 200 0.3–0.73 1000 3.2–3.7
F5 190 5 36 9.6 t: sintered glass m: sponge b:ceramic rings Tetra Goldfish flakes 42 200 1.6–1.9 500 4.1–4.8
F6 (temporal test)* 49 0.13 1.2 13 sponge Vitakraft Vita Flake-Mix, Sera Viformo tablets 47, 45.7 80, 30 28–34 200, 40 84–103
F6 (spatial test) 49 6.1 31 19 t: fine sponge m:rough sponge b:ceramic rings Vitakraft Vita Flake-Mix, Sera Viformo tablets N.A. NA NA NA NA

Feeding doses were for cycles of five days on, two days off. The minimum biofilter loading rates are based on the measured nitrate production rates, while the maximum rates assume that all fed nitrogen is nitrified.

b, m, t: biofilter bottom, middle and top compartment, respectively. N.A.: not applicable.

* For F6 (temporal test), two different fish feed and their corresponding protein content and feed dose are shown by comma-separated text.