Table 2. Conclusions of evidence for breast cancer surveillance for female childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors.
| Who needs breast cancer surveillance? | |
|
| |
| Breast cancer risk in childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors | |
|
| |
| ○ High risk after >20 Gy chest radiation | Level A 6 |
| • High risk after 10-19 Gy chest radiation* | Level B 26-30 |
| • High risk after 1-9 Gy chest radiation* | Level C 26-30 |
| • High risk after total body irradiation* | Level C35 |
| • High risk after high abdominal field radiation | Level C 28 |
| • Decreased risk after alkylating agent chemotherapy* | Level B 27,29,30,36-39 |
| ○ Decreased risk after ≥5 Gy radiation to the ovaries* | Level B 27,29,36 |
|
| |
| At what age should breast cancer surveillance be initiated? | |
|
| |
| Breast cancer risk in childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors | |
|
| |
| ○ Increased risk as early as 8 years after chest radiation or 25 years of age | Level A 6,36,38-41 |
|
| |
| At what frequency should breast cancer surveillance be performed? | |
|
| |
| Breast cancer risk in childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors | |
|
| |
| ○ Risk increases with increasing length of follow-up in survivors up to age 50 years | Level A 6,36,38-41 |
|
| |
| At what age should breast cancer surveillance be stopped? | |
|
| |
| Breast cancer risk in childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors | |
|
| |
| • Course of breast cancer risk over time in survivors aged >50 years | No evidence |
|
| |
| What surveillance modality should be used? | |
|
| |
| Diagnostic value clinical breast exam, mammography and breast MRI in childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors | |
|
| |
| • Diagnostic value for breast cancer | No evidence |
| • Mammography can detect breast cancer in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors treated with chest radiation | Level B 46,48-50,65,66 |
|
| |
| Diagnostic value clinical breast exam in other populations | |
|
| |
| ○ Poor diagnostic value for breast cancer in women in the general population and in women with an inherited susceptibility to breast cancer | Level B 54-59 |
|
| |
| Diagnostic value clinical breast exam in women aged <25 years in other populations | |
|
| |
| • Diagnostic value for breast cancer | No evidence |
|
| |
| Diagnostic value mammography in other populations | |
|
| |
| ○ Good diagnostic value for breast cancer in women with an inherited susceptibility to breast cancer | Level A64,71 |
|
| |
| Diagnostic value breast MRI in other populations | |
|
| |
| ○ Good diagnostic value for breast cancer in women with an inherited susceptibility to breast cancer | Level A 64, 11 |
|
| |
| Diagnostic value breast MRI and mammography compared to either test alone in other populations | |
|
| |
| ○ Better diagnostic value for breast cancer of a breast MRI and mammography than either test alone in women with an inherited susceptibility to breast cancer | Level A64,71 |
|
| |
| Diagnostic value breast MRI and mammography compared to breast MRI alone in women aged 25-35 years in other populations | |
|
| |
| • Diagnostic value for breast cancer of a breast MRI and mammography compared to breast MRI alone in women aged 25-35 years | No evidence |
|
| |
| Diagnostic value mammography compared to breast MRI in women in a young age group compared to another age group in other populations | |
|
| |
| • Different diagnostic value for breast cancer in the younger age group (<40 year or <50 year) than in the older age group (≥50 year) for both mammography and breast MRI in women with an inherited susceptibility to breast cancer | Level B 72,73 |
Level A = high level of evidence; Level B = moderate/low level of evidence; Level C = very low level of evidence.
○Evidence extracted from the existing guidelines: COG,17 DCOG18 (including the National Breast Cancer Organization Netherlands (NABON) guideline),34 and UKCCLG.20 •Evidence as presented in the evidence summaries (Appendix 2).
Reference numbers 30 and 36 also included women aged >30 years at Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosis.