Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Sep;46(9):1759–1763. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.03.070

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Time-to-healing analysis of Biobrane vs BGC in pediatric partial-thickness burns. Using the Cox proportional hazards model, the days to complete healing of the burn is demonstrated for Biobrane (solid line) vs BGC (dotted line). The hazard ratio associated with healing time comparing Biobrane vs BGC was 1.68, meaning that a patient receiving the Biobrane treatment who has not yet healed by a certain day has 1.68 times the chance of being healed by the next day compared with someone in the BGC group (hazard ratio, 1.68*; 95% confidence interval, 1.09–2.60). *Cox proportional hazards test.