Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 3;91(6):1079–1087. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0735

Table 2.

Incidence rate and cumulative incidence of malaria in clusters treated with metofluthrin (active)- and placebo coils

Wainyapu Umbungedo All villages
Cluster 1 (W1) Cluster 2 (W2) Cluster 3 (U1) Cluster 4 (U2) Cluster 1 + 4 Cluster 2 + 3
90% Active+ 10% placebo 10% Active+ 90% placebo 10% Active+ 90% placebo 90% Active+ 10% placebo Active clusters Placebo clusters
Household active:placebo 108 (98:10) 114 (11:103) 115 (12:103) 108 (98:10) 216 (196:20) 229 (23:206)
Population 368 523 596 633 1001 1119
Samples 42 44 43 41 83 87
Malaria incident 26 40 21 5 31 61
Incidence density
 Person-week 652 602 866 888 1540 1468
 Incidence rate 0.040 0.066 0.024 0.006 0.020 0.042
Without clustering effect
 RR (95% CI) 0.484 (0.314–0.746)
With clustering effect
 RRGM (95% CI) 0.652 (0.088–4.802)
Cumulative incidence
 Proportion of incidence 0.619 0.909 0.488 0.122 0.373
Without clustering effect
 RR (95% CI) 0.533 (0.390–0.727)
With clustering effect
Cluster-specific adjusted χ2 (P-value) 2.356 (P = 0.124)

RR = rate ratio; CI = confidence interval.