Table 2.
Days post inoculum | EI-1 | E1-2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bats positive to the following tests | Bats positive to the following tests | |||||
Platelia NS1 | RT-PCR Lanciotti | RT-PCT GAPDH | Platelia NS1 | RT-PCR Lanciotti | RT-PCT GAPDH | |
Day 1 | – | – | 1, 2 | – | – | 11, 12 |
Day 2 | – | – | No samples | – | – | No samples |
Day 3 | – | – | 3, 4 | – | – | No samples |
Day 4 | – | – | No samples | – | 13 (suspected) | 13, 14 |
Day 5 | – | – | 5, 6 | – | – | No samples |
Day 6 | – | – | No samples | – | – | No samples |
Day 7 | 8 | 8 (suspected) | 7, 8 | 15 | 16 (suspected) | 15, 16 |
Day 8 | – | – | No samples | – | – | No samples |
Day 9 | – | – | 9, 10 | 18 (suspected) | 17, 18 | |
Days post inoculum | E1-3 | E1-4 | ||||
Bats positive to the following tests | Bats positive to the following tests | |||||
Platelia NS1 | RT-PCR Lanciotti | RT-PCT GAPDH | Platelia NS1 | RT-PCR Lanciotti | RT-PCT GAPDH | |
Day 1 | 19, 20 | – | 19, 20 | No samples collected | ||
Day 2 | – | – | No samples | |||
Day 3 | – | – | No samples | |||
Day 4 | 21, 22 | – | 21, 22 | |||
Day 5 | – | – | No samples | – | – | 1a, 1b |
Day 6 | – | – | No samples | – | – | No samples |
Day 7 | – | – | 23, 24 | – | 2a (suspected) | 2a, 2b |
Day 8 | – | – | No samples | – | – | No samples |
Day 9 | – | – | No samples | – | – | No samples |
Day 10 | – | 26 (suspected) | 25, 26 | – | – | No samples |
Day 11 | – | – | No samples | – | – | 3a, 3b |
Day 12 | – | 28 (suspected) | 27, 28 | – | – | No samples |
Day 13 | – | – | No samples | |||
Day 14 | – | – | No samples | |||
Day 15 | – | – | No samples | |||
Day 16 | 4b | – | 4a, 4b | |||
Day 17 | 5a | 5a (suspected) | 5a, 5b |
Results obtained with Mock inoculated bats are not present for simplicity. The reverse-transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and NS1 assays carried out the samples collected from these animals all resulted as negatives.