Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Care. 2016 Jun;54(6):e35–e42. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000056

Table 4.

Random Effects Logistic Regression Predicting Likelihood of HEDIS Guideline-Concordant Treatment within 3 Months Following a Positive Depression Screen across 3 VA Sites

IPQ-R subscale
(main
component)
HEDIS Guideline-Concordant Depression
Treatment (n=81) vs. Others (n=161)
ICC=12.4%
Beta SE 95% CI
Depressed mood (Identity) −1.28** 0.45 −2.16, −0.40
Cyclical timeline (Timeline) −0.50* 0.25 −0.98, −0.01
Personal control (Cure/Control) −0.86* 0.42 −1.69, −0.03
External control (Cure/Control) 1.10** 0.39 0.33, 1.87
Poor health (Cause) 0.21 0.24 −0.27, 0.68
Family (Cause) −0.68* 0.31 −1.29, −0.07
Risky behavior (Cause) 0.46 0.30 −0.13, 1.05
Consequence −0.70 0.37 −1.43, 0.03
Race (White) 0.35 0.66 −0.94, 1.64
Gender (Male) −0.72 0.67 −2.04, 0.61
Ages 20–50 0.65 0.66 −0.96, 2.25
Ages 51–60 0.81 0.60 −0.66, 2.28
Ages 61–70 0.42 0.60 −1.05, 1.89
Depression Treatment (Past 5 Years) 1.37*** 0.38 0.63, 2.11
Total PHQ-2 score 0.005 0.15 −0.30, 0.30

Note:

*

p<.05.

**

p<.01.

***

p<.001.

N=242 in final model to account for missing data.

SE=Standard Error, CI=Confidence Interval, Bold indicates statistical significance at any level from p<.05. IPQ-R Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised. IPQ-R variables that were not significant are not included in the table.