Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 27;15:66. doi: 10.1186/2050-6511-15-66

Table 2.

Significant associations of mutations and amplifications with drug response in HNSCC cell lines

Drug Gene Comparison p LFDR Mean WT/NA log2(IC50(μM)) Mut/Amp log2(IC50(μM)) Effect Log2(IC50(μM)) [95% CI]
ATRA TP53 wild-type vs mutant <0.001 0.0069 9.96 7.15 2.81 [1.82-3.79]
AZD6482 PIK3CA wild-type vs mutant <0.001 0.023 4.87 0.689 4.18 [2.73-5.63]
JNK Inhibitor VIII EGFR non-amplified vs. amplified <0.001 0.056 8.31 5.96 2.34 [1.49-3.20]
AZD6482 EGFR non-amplified vs. amplified <0.001 0.056 4.83 1.11 3.72 [2.17-5.26]
PF-562271 PIK3CA wild-type vs mutant <0.001 0.079 2.88 0.379 2.50 [1.55-3.46]

Legend: p – p value testing interaction, LFDR - local false discovery rate, WT - wild-type, NA - non-amplified, Mut – mutation, Amp – amplified, CI - confidence interval.