Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 7;20(45):16956–16963. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.16956

Table 1.

Table of studies involving emergent laparoscopic colorectal surgery and inflammatory bowel disease

Ref. Type of study Number of LCS patients Institution Main outcome
Nash et al[27] Comparative 36 Single No difference in morbidity;
Longer operating time in LCS;
Shorter hospital stay
Stulberg et al[14] Comparative 42 Single-centre Less blood loss, shorter stay, less morbidity
Marceau et al[26] Comparative 40 Single-centre Similar operating time;
Hospital stay similar;
Morbidity similar
Fowkes et al[21] Comparative 22 Single centre Shorter hospital stay;
Similar morbidity
Seshadri et al[28] Comparative 37 Single-centre Longer operating time in LCS;
No differences in complications;
Less post-op morbidity;
Shorter hospital stay
Watanabe et al[29] Comparative 30 Single-centre Longer operating time in LCS;
Fewer post-op complications in LCS;
Faster gut recovery in LCS
Qazi et al[24] Comparative 17 Single-centre Increased complications in LCS;
Conversion rate of 32%
Marcello et al[6] Comparative 16 Single-centre Early oral intake in LCS;
No difference in morbidity
Ouaïssi et al[25] Single cohort 18 Single-centre Safe; feasible;
Morbidity 33%
Bell and Seymour[31] Single cohort 18 Single-centre High morbidity;
Shorter hospital stay

LCS: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery.