Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 7;20(45):16984–16995. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.16984

Table 2.

Comparison of two-man method vs one-man sitting method vs one-man standing method

Two-man method One-man standing method One-man sitting method
The proportion of colonoscopists using methods A few Most A few (More than two-man method)
Minimal number of assistants Two people One person One person
Space Relatively large The smallest Small
Colonoscope Only long length adult-colonoscope Both long length- and intermediate length- adult colonoscope (Intermediate-scope preferred) Both long length- and intermediate length- adult colonoscope (Intermediate-scope preferred)
The role of colonoscopist Only manipulation of the control section of colonoscope; most manipulations of colonoscope such as advance (push-forward) and withdrawal (pull-back) by assistant All manipulations of colonoscope including advance, withdrawal, and handling of the control section All manipulations of colonoscope including advance, withdrawal, and handling of the control section
The fatigue of colonoscopist Low High Lowest
Location of examinee's anus Below examiner's head Below examiner's head Examiner's head level (colonoscopist may be required to wear a mask for hygiene reasons)
The risk of perforation Relatively high (colonoscopist cannot feel the colonoscope insertion) Relatively low (colonoscopist can feel the colonoscope insertion) Relatively low (colonoscopist can feel the colonoscope insertion)