Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep;134(Suppl 1):S4–S12. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0646C

TABLE 3.

Distribution of Select Characteristics Among Respondents and Nonrespondents in the Y6FU, Based on Information From the IFPSII

Characteristic Participants in the Y6FU (N = 1542), % Nonparticipants in the Y6FU (N = 1416), % χ2 Probability
Maternal characteristics
 Age (y) <.001
  18–24 15.1 31.4
  25–34 65.1 58.5
  35–43 19.8 10.1
 Marital status <.001
  Married or cohabiting 83.7 73.9
  Other 16.3 26.1
 Education <.001
  High school or less 16.6 25.8
  Some college 37.2 43.4
  College graduate 46.2 30.8
 Income (% of poverty threshold) <.001
  <185% 35.2 48.9
  185–<350% 37.9 33.7
  ≥350% 26.9 17.4
 Employment status (prenatal) .30
  Employed 67.0 65.2
  Not employed 33.0 34.8
 Parity .37
  1 28.3 29.8
  2 42.2 39.6
  ≥3 29.5 30.6
 Race and ethnicity <.01
  White 86.6 81.8
  Black 3.7 6.1
  Hispanic 5.6 7.0
  Other 4.1 5.1
 Region <.001
  West 19.7 20.6
  Midwest 31.1 28.7
  South 29.7 35.5
  Northeast 19.5 15.2
 Prenatal smoking <.001
  Yes 7.4 12.2
  No 92.6 87.8
 Prenatal care, initial visit (wk) <.01
  <13 90.6 87.0
  13–24 6.1 7.9
  ≥25 3.3 5.1
 Returned to work when infant was ≤6 wk old .29
  Yes 14.3 16.0
  No 85.7 84.0
 Prepregnancy BMI .48
  Underweight (<18.5) 4.3 5.2
  Normal wt (18.5–24.9) 44.7 45.7
  Overweight (25.0–29.9) 26.3 26.0
  Obese (≥30.0) 24.7 23.1
 Number of postnatal questionnaires returned <.001
  1–7 25.5 53.2
  8–10 74.5 46.8
Infant characteristics
 Gender .60
  Male 50.0 49.0
  Female 50.0 51.0
 Breastfeeding initiation .18
  Yes 86.2 84.5
  No 13.8 15.5
 Breastfeeding durationa (wk) <.001
  <3 20.7 24.3
  3–17.1 19.5 25.7
  ≥17.2 29.7 20.3
  Breastfeeding at last questionnaire 30.1 29.7
 WIC participation <.001
  Yes 31.9 49.7
  No 68.1 50.3
 Food allergy .17
  Yes 22.9 20.5
  No 77.1 79.5
 Birth wt (lb) .06
  <8 63.0 66.3
  ≥8 37.0 33.7
 Gestational age (wk) .37
  <39 34.4 36.0
  ≥39 65.6 64.0

WIC, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.

a

Breastfeeding duration was divided into categories by tertile among those with a value (ie, those that were not censored), and the censored cases formed a fourth category.