Table 4.

Multiple-mediator path analyses with fear of condom negotiation, relationship power, and refusal self-efficacy as proposed mediators in the association between abuse history and consistent condom use (n=558)

	βa	SE of β	p-value	Indirect Effectd
Model with no mediator
History of abuse → CCU	−.452	.230	.049*	--
Model 1
History of abuse	−.423	.231	.067
Relationship power	.028	.023	.231	−.002 (−.121 – .008)
Fear of condom negotiation	−.008	.041	.852	−.003 (−.122 – .017)
Model 2
History of abuse	−.476	.232	.040*
Refusal self-efficacy	−.043	.033	.195	.004 (−.013 – .128)
Fear of condom negotiation	−.028	.043	.512	−.004 (−.078 – .016)
Model 3
History of abuse	−.459	.233	.049*
Refusal self-efficacy	−.054	.034	.114	.002 (−.004 – .148)
Relationship power	.039	.024	.105	−.001 (−.119 – .003)
Model 4
History of abuse	−.455	.233	.051
Refusal self-efficacy	−.056	.035	.105	.005 (−.011 – .134)
Relationship power	.037	.024	.127	−.002 (−.117 – .006)
Fear of condom negotiation	−.017	.043	.693	−.004 (−.072 – .019)

Note. SE: standard error; CCU: consistent condom use;

^aunstandardized parameter estimate for association with consistent condom use;

^bBoot-strap and bias-corrected parameter estimate and bias-corrected and accelerated 95% confidence interval for indirect effects of history of abuse on consistent condom use through proposed mediator;

^*p<.05; Lifetime drug use and lifetime total sex partners (log-transformed) included in each model