Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 8;8:388. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00388

Table 6.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of emotional processing during HRT.

Study Subjects [STRAW stage] Age (y) Hormonal treatment Technique Test Comparison Results Notes
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Love et al., 2010 10 57 ± 1 No HT (>3m): fMRI Emotion processing (positive, neutral, negative stimuli) Placebo vs. HT [Neg] = Behavior
[S:≥+1B] gr1: E+P (4w) + wash-out (4w) and placebo (4w) HT: ↑ OFC, OC l, precG r, pC l
gr2: placebo (4w) + wash-out (4w) and E+P (4w) Placebo: ↑dlPFC l, postcG r, daC
[Pos]
Placebo: ↑ mFC l
CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES
Shafir et al., 2012 52 67 ± 6 HT (within 2y of MP and ≥10y): fMRI Emotion processing (positive, neutral, negative stimuli) NT vs. HT n.s. ↑ Time for picture rating in HT;
[S:≥+2] 65 ± 5 65 ± 5 gr1 (n = 15): CEE NT vs. ET NT: Pos–Neu: ↑ mFG l (BA10), aC (BA24+32) ↑ Accuracy in current HT
ET: Neg–Neu: ↑entorhinal cortex r
65 ± 5 gr2 (n = 20): CEE+P NT vs. HT NT: Pos–Neu: ↑Ins r
gr3 (n = 17): NT Current vs. past HT Current HT: Pos–Neu: ↑HC r
Frey et al., 2010 11 51 ± 6 / fMRI Emotion regulation High- vs. low- emotional conflict resolution High-conflict resolution: dlPFC (BA42+40+13+9+7+Pu+30+6+Cau+30+39) ! No comparison group
[S:≥−2] (40–60)

See Appendix for acronyms/abbreviations.