Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb;89:19–32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.08.010

Table 2.

Comparison of GRM2−/− and wild-type (WT) mice in the Black & White Alley, the Elevated Plus Maze and Open Field.

Task & measure WT GRM2−/− Statistics
Black & White Alley
Total time in white arm (s) 40.2 ± 2.6 37.5 ± 2.8 t < 1; p > 0.40
Number of crossings 8.7 ± 0.9 8.6 ± 0.8 t < 1; p > 0.90
Elevated Plus Maze
% time in open arms 11.1 ± 1.9 12.5 ± 1.9 t < 1; p > 0.50
Latency to enter open arms (s) 25.1 (10.6–37.6) 11.5 (1.7–20.6) U = 72; p = 0.150
Total distance travelled (cm) 1410.8 ± 116.4 1543.2 ± 101.0 t < 1; p > 0.40
Number of open arm entries 9.6 ± 1.3 11.1 ± 1.3 t < 1; p > 0.40
Open Field
Time in centre (s) 7.3 ± 0.8 5.6 ± 0.5 t(27) = 1.76; p = 0.089
Latency to enter centre (s) 28 (24.6–38.5) 20.2 (6.53–57.4) U = 78; p = 0.239
Total distance travelled (cm) 3314.3 ± 155.1 3119.2 ± 142.9 t < 1; p > 0.30

Parametric data are presented as mean ± SEM and were analysed with t-tests. Non-parametric data are presented as median (inter-quartile range) and were analysed with Mann–Whitney U-tests. n = 15 WT; n = 14 GRM2−/−.