Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb;89:19–32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.08.010

Table 6.

Comparison of GRM3−/− and wild-type (WT) mice in two versions of the Neophagia Test.

Task & measure WT GRM3−/− Statistics
Neophagia I (Milk/Jug)
Latency to contact (s) 3 (2–4.5) 4 (2.5–8.5) U = 85; p = 0.254
Latency to drink (s) 44 (12.5–85) 12 (4.5–30) U = 73.5; p = 0.106
Latency to drink – latency to contact (s) 42 (9.5–83) 3 (2–25) U = 72; p = 0.093
Neophagia II (Noyes/Y-maze)
Latency to contact (s) 40 (20–128.5) 18 (10.5–28) U = 65.5; p = 0.051
Latency to eat (s) 217 (147.5–279.5) 110 (77.5–160.5) U = 39; p = 0.002**
Latency to eat – latency to contact (s) 108 (82.5–216.5) 93 (36–140) U = 89.5; p = 0.340

**p < 0.01. Non-parametric data are presented as median (inter-quartile range) and were analysed with Mann–Whitney U-tests. n = 15 WT; n = 15 GRM3−/−.