Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Stimul. 2014 Jul 19;7(6):890–899. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.07.034

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Intermittent stimulation pattern. A. Example of seizure suppression by intermittent stimulation with 50 Hz bursts. Three 50 Hz bursts with 5-second duration were applied to study the effect of second and third burst periods compared to that of the first burst period when the interrupted time increases. B. Suppression percentages calculated from the second burst stimulation period compared to that from the first period with increase of interrupted time. 100 % of compared suppression means that second stimulation induced suppression percentage as the same level as the first stimulation. C. Suppression percentages calculated from the third burst stimulation period. *Overall one way ANOVA, p<0.05. # compared to the no-interruption group, Duncan test, p<0.05.