Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Stimul. 2014 Jul 23;7(6):784–792. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.07.035

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Mean proportion of sentences with at least one error (±SE) in the anodal and sham conditions. The upper panel shows the average of all error types. The lower panel breaks down errors by type. This figure shows that across the board there are fewer errors in the anodal vs. sham condition.