Table 2.
CT | MRI |
Advantages | |
Fast | Superior soft tissue resolution including better assessment of perineural invasion, intracranial extension of disease, marrow infiltration |
Well tolerated | Multi-planar imaging capability, better definition of cradiocaudal extent |
Relatively inexpensive | Less image degradation caused by artifacts arising from dental amalgam |
Provides assessment of tissue composition (vascularity, lipid content etc.) | Does not involve ionizing radiation |
Ideal at demonstrating cortical bone erosion | Contrast material is less likely to produce allergic reaction |
Disadvantages | |
Involves exposure to small amounts of radiation | May take more time to perform |
Inferior soft tissue resolution compared with MRI | More expensive |
Higher risk of allergic reactions and nephrotoxicity associated with the use of iodinated contrast agents | Lower patient tolerance; Claustrophobic patients may need sedation |
Contraindicated in patients with pacemakers and other implanted metallic devices which may malfunction following exposure to strong magnetic fields | |
More susceptible to motion artefact |
CT: Computed tomography; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging.