Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1981 Oct;68(4):885–890. doi: 10.1104/pp.68.4.885

Ozone Sensitivity in Sweet Corn (Zea mays L.) Plants: A Possible Relationship to Water Balance

Michael J Harris 1, Robert L Heath 1
PMCID: PMC426006  PMID: 16662019

Abstract

Stomatal characteristics affecting gas exchange were compared in two sweet corn hybrids (var. Bonanza and Monarch Advance) which differ in foliar ozone sensitivity. No significant differences were observed in stomatal frequencies, guard cell lengths, or conductances to water vapor diffusion.

When plant water status was compared, leaf-water potentials for the ozone-resistant cultivar, Bonanza, were lower. A comparison of the relationship between soil- and leaf-water potential indicated that the leaf-water potential of Bonanza was more sensitive to declines in soil-water potential. Additionally, a comparison of stomatal conductance to water vapor diffusion as soil moisture declined and following root detachment indicated that stomata of Bonanza were, likewise, more sensitive to increasing water stress. Data suggest that these differences are attributable to a greater shoot-to-root fresh weight ratio and higher resistance to water movement in the water-conducting tissues for Bonanza.

Our observations suggest that root and water delivery system characteristics play a major contributory role in the determination of foliar ozone sensitivity in this species.

Full text

PDF
885

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boyer J. S. Differing sensitivity of photosynthesis to low leaf water potentials in corn and soybean. Plant Physiol. 1970 Aug;46(2):236–239. doi: 10.1104/pp.46.2.236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jordan W. R., Ritchie J. T. Influence of soil water stress on evaporation, root absorption, and internal water status of cotton. Plant Physiol. 1971 Dec;48(6):783–788. doi: 10.1104/pp.48.6.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Michel B. E., Kaufmann M. R. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant Physiol. 1973 May;51(5):914–916. doi: 10.1104/pp.51.5.914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sanchez-Diaz M. F., Kramer P. J. Behavior of Corn and Sorghum under Water Stress and during Recovery. Plant Physiol. 1971 Nov;48(5):613–616. doi: 10.1104/pp.48.5.613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Twente J. W., Twente J. A. Regulation of hibernating periods by temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Oct;54(4):1044–1051. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zelitch I. BIOCHEMICAL CONTROL OF STOMATAL OPENING IN LEAVES. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1961 Sep;47(9):1423–1433. doi: 10.1073/pnas.47.9.1423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES