Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 18;234(1):11–22. doi: 10.1002/path.4349

Table 1.

Correlation between HH pathway factors and pathological parameters in glioma patients

Feature Shh on ECs Gli1 on pGCs
Negative (n) Moderate (n) High (n) p Negative (n) Moderate (n) High (n) p
WHO grade
II 9 18 6 0.041* 13 12 8 0.022*
III 4 5 7 2 5 9
IV 2 7 7 0.112** 3 7 6 0.068**
Gender
Male 10 21 16 0.231 5 7 6 0.635
Female 5 9 4 13 17 17
Age
≥ 60 years 0 2 3 0.095 0 2 3 0.152
< 60 years 15 28 17 18 22 20
KPS
≥ 80 13 21 13 0.363 11 16 17 0.839
< 80 7 9 5 7 8 6
Tumour location
Frontal 13 15 8 0.971 8 16 9 0.671
Non-frontal 7 15 10 10 8 14
*

Unpaired Student's t-test was used for comparison between low-grade (grade II) and high-grade (grade III and IV) gliomas.

**

Kruskal–Wallis analysis was used for comparison of Shh on ECs and Gli1 on pGCs in the three grades of glioma.

KPS, Karnofsky Performance Scale.