Table 1.
Feature | Shh on ECs | Gli1 on pGCs | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Negative (n) | Moderate (n) | High (n) | p | Negative (n) | Moderate (n) | High (n) | p | |
WHO grade | ||||||||
II | 9 | 18 | 6 | 0.041* | 13 | 12 | 8 | 0.022* |
III | 4 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 9 | ||
IV | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0.112** | 3 | 7 | 6 | 0.068** |
Gender | ||||||||
Male | 10 | 21 | 16 | 0.231 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 0.635 |
Female | 5 | 9 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 17 | ||
Age | ||||||||
≥ 60 years | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0.095 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0.152 |
< 60 years | 15 | 28 | 17 | 18 | 22 | 20 | ||
KPS | ||||||||
≥ 80 | 13 | 21 | 13 | 0.363 | 11 | 16 | 17 | 0.839 |
< 80 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 6 | ||
Tumour location | ||||||||
Frontal | 13 | 15 | 8 | 0.971 | 8 | 16 | 9 | 0.671 |
Non-frontal | 7 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 14 |
Unpaired Student's t-test was used for comparison between low-grade (grade II) and high-grade (grade III and IV) gliomas.
Kruskal–Wallis analysis was used for comparison of Shh on ECs and Gli1 on pGCs in the three grades of glioma.
KPS, Karnofsky Performance Scale.