Table 5.
1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Housing hardship | |||||||
| |||||||
WES | 19% | 17% | 17% | 15% | 19% | ||
IFS | 20% | 19% | 10% | 11% | |||
MTAS | 66% | 68% | 70% | ||||
FF | NA | 48% | 55% | ||||
3-City | 6% | 3% | |||||
| |||||||
Food hardship | |||||||
| |||||||
WES | 25% | 23% | 23% | 17% | 19% | ||
IFS | 34% | 33% | 26% | 34% | |||
MTAS | NA | 54% | 52% | ||||
FF | NA | 7% | NA | ||||
3-City | 17% | 10% | |||||
| |||||||
Unmet health care needs | |||||||
| |||||||
WES | NA | NA | 29% | 32% | 33% | ||
IFS | 22% | 19% | 14% | 15% | |||
MTAS | 18% | 12% | 13% | ||||
FF | NA | 6% | 8% | ||||
3-City | 11% | 8% | |||||
| |||||||
Positive perception of economic well-being | |||||||
| |||||||
WES | 27% | 40% | 47% | 45% | 41% | ||
IFS | 61% | 67% | 64% | 64% | |||
MTAS | NA | NA | 63% | ||||
FF | 78% | NA | 63% | ||||
3-City | 71% | 76% | |||||
| |||||||
Reside with extended family | |||||||
| |||||||
WES | 10% | 14% | 17% | 19% | 20% | ||
IFS | 7% | 4% | 5% | 5% | |||
MTAS | 24% | 18% | 13% | ||||
FF | 27% | 20% | 14% | ||||
3-City | 41% | 31% |
NA=Not Available.