Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 9;6:326. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00326

Table 4.

Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) for VSWM and PLTM between adjacent levels and the highest vs. lowest levels of Age and Hear, for the same analyses shown in Table 3 and Figure 1.

Age, years Cohen’s d
VSWM PLTM
<48 vs. 48–57 0.162 0.059
48–57 vs. 58–67 0.171 0.162
58–67 vs. >67 0.146 0.214
<48 vs. >67 0.478 0.461
Hear
Normal vs. Insufficient 0.134 0.250
Insufficient vs. Poor 0.041 0.324
Normal vs. Poor 0.175 0.646

Note. The values in the Table can be compared to Cohen’s (1988) proposed rules of thumb for interpreting effect sizes: a “small” effect size is 0.20, a “medium” effect size is 0.50, and a “large” effect size is 0.80.