Table 3. Number of participants (and total N per condition) who showed preference for enforcement (over reform) solutions, as a factor of the metaphorical framing (problem, beast, virus), metaphorical support (present, absent) and, for Experiments 1–2, exposure (pre or post-reading of stimulus text).
Experiment 1 | Experiment 2 | Experiment 3 | Experiment 4 | |||
Pre-reading | Post-reading | Pre-reading | Post-reading | Post-reading | Post-reading | |
Crime is a Problem frame | ||||||
Metaphorical support present | 22 (45) | 37 (45) | 17 (39) | 27 (39) | 23 (36) | 90 (162) |
Metaphorical support absent | 26 (42) | 30 (42) | 15 (40) | 24 (40) | 22 (44) | 94 (167) |
Crime is a Beast frame | ||||||
Metaphorical support present | 23 (40) | 30 (40) | 17 (47) | 27 (47) | 27 (44) | 92 (178) |
Metaphorical support absent | 23 (40) | 33 (40) | 11 (44) | 19 (44) | 25 (43) | 97 (180) |
Crime is a Virus frame | ||||||
Metaphorical support present | 27 (40) | 34 (40) | 14 (42) | 26 (42) | 22 (40) | 100 (172) |
Metaphorical support absent | 26 (46) | 38 (46) | 14 (47) | 27 (47) | 27 (45) | 87 (167) |