Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2014 Jun 4;19(2):648–659. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2014.2328870

TABLE IV.

Performance Comparison of Proposed CADe System with Existing Systems using the LIDC-IDRI Database

CADe Systems Number of
cases
Number of
nodules
Nodule size
used
Agreement
level
Average
FPs/scan
Sensitivity (%) Detection time
(seconds)
Golosio et al [22] 84 148 >= 3 mm 1 4.0 45.0 -
Opfer and Wiemker
[39]
- 127 >= 4 mm 1 4.0 76.0 180-300
Riccardi et al. [20] 154 387 - 1 4.0 49.0 -
Sahiner et al. [40] 48 73 3 - 36.4 mm 1 4.9 79.0 -
Tan et al. [23] 125 259 >= 3 mm 1 3.0 66.4 -
The proposed system 205 490 >= 3 mm 1 4.0 82.7 20 – 25