Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 10.
Published in final edited form as: Macromol Biosci. 2013 Nov 27;13(12):1700–1710. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201300323

Table 1.

Effect of formation variables on self-healing microsphere propertiesa

Method of adjusting porosity in Formulation Variable in formulation Porosity of self-healing microspheres (%) 28-day lysozyme release (%) Monomeric enzyme remaining (%) Insoluble enzyme remaining (%) Mass balance (%)b
Varying Base Content 0% MgCO3 60.0 30.4 ± 0.7 57 ± 2 4 ± 1 92 ± 2
1.5% MgCO3 64.3 41.3 ± 0.5 47 ± 1 3 ± 1 91 ± 1
4.3% MgCO3 68.8 51 ± 4 46 ± 1 3 ± 1 99 ± 4
11% MgCO3 66.2 57 ± 4 51 ± 1 1.4 ± 0.1 110 ± 4
Varying Inner Water Phase Volume 25 μL 49.5 30 ± 3 76 ± 4 11 ± 2 117 ± 5
100 μL 60.6 25.9 ± 0.3 64 ± 3 6 ± 1 96 ± 3
200 μL 64.0 33 ± 2 62 ± 2 5 ± 1 100 ± 3
350 μL 59.7 24.5 ± 0.6 55 ± 1 5 ± 1 85 ± 1
Varying Polymer Concentration 200 mg/mL 65.2 34.4 ± 0.3 55 ± 2 4 ± 1 93 ± 2
260 mg/mL 61.0 20.6 ± 0.8 74 ± 2 6 ± 1 100 ± 2
320 mg/mL 72.7 46.6 ± 0.5 42 ± 2 6 ± 3 95 ± 3
400 mg/mL 64.6 57 ± 2 30 ± 2 3 ± 1 89 ± 2
a

All data reported as mean ± SEM (n=3); formulation conditions listed in Experimental Methods;

b

Mass balance = 28-day release + monomeric remaining + insoluble remaining; no soluble aggregate in residual samples.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure