Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 26;15(1):319. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-319

Table 1.

The TCR-CD1d-Ag and TCR-MR1-Ag test cases

PDB code
Complex TCR Ligand TCR name TCR type Ligand name Binding RMSD 1, Å Difficulty 2
3HUJ [15] 2EYS [16] 1ZT4 [17] NKT15 Type I NKT CD1d-α-GalCer 1.04 Rigid
4EI5 [5] 4EI6 [5] 2AKR [18] XV19 Type II NKT CD1d-sulfatide 1.08 Medium
4LHU [9] 4LFH [9] 1ZT4 [17] 9C2 γδ CD1d-α-GalCer 0.90 Rigid
4MNG [10] 4MNH [10] 4MQ7 [10] DP10.7 γδ CD1d-sulfatide 0.68 Rigid
4L4T [8] 3 4DZB [19] 3 4GUP [3] MAIT MAIT MR1-6FP 0.87 Rigid

1Backbone atom root-mean-square distance between interface residues in the bound structure and corresponding residues in the unbound structures.

2Docking difficulty, based on extent of binding conformational changes [20].

3The bound and unbound MAIT TCRs are closely related, with nearly identical α chains; the differing β chains (TRBV6 in 4L4T and TRBV20 in 4DZB) were excluded from RMSD calculations and evaluation of docking predictions.