Table 2.
Meta-analysis results for different transformations simulating dose–response relationships
| Walking | Cycling | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dose–response | Relative risk | 95% CI | Relative risk | 95% CI |
| Linear | 0.89 | 0.83-0.96 | 0.90 | 0.87-0.94 |
| Log-linear | 0.90 | 0.85-0.95 | 0.90 | 0.86-0.94 |
| 0.75 power | 0.90 | 0.85-0.95 | 0.89 | 0.85-0.93 |
| 0.50 power | 0.90 | 0.86-0.94 | 0.87 | 0.83-0.91 |
| 0.375 power | 0.90 | 0.86-0.94 | 0.86 | 0.81-0.91 |
| 0.25 power | 0.90 | 0.86-0.94 | 0.84 | 0.79-0.90 |
Relative risks and 95% confidence interval estimated at 11.25 MET. hours per week.