Table 1. Studies comparing OS and PFS with VEGF TKI-mTORi versus VEGF TKI-VEGF TKI (HR<1 favors second-line mTORi versus VEGF TKI).
Study | DataSource | InclusionCriteria | mTORiincluded | VEGFTKIincluded | RetrospectiveCohort | Adjustment | Multicenter | N,mTORi | N,VEGFTKI | OS HR(95% CI)a | PFS HR(95% CI)b |
Buschet al.2011 | Medicalrecords from2 centers inGermany | Progression on first-line VEGF TKI | Everolimus | Sunitinibandsorafenib | Y | Yd | Y | 62 | 46 | 0.79(0.43, 1.45) | 0.86(0.57–1.28)d |
Chenet al.2012 | US claimsdata | Received sunitinib | Everolimus | Sorafenib | Y | Y | Y | 117 | 65 | 1.03(0.59, 1.79) | N/A |
Henget al.2012c | Internationalregistry(Canada,UnitedStates,Singapore, andDenmark)b | Received first-line VEGF TKI | Everolimusandtemsirolimus | Sunitinibandsorafenib | Y | Yd | Y | 277 | 541 | 0.84(0.67, 1.06) | 1.18(0.92–1.5)d |
Wonget al.2013 | Nationwidechart reviewin the UnitedStates | Failed first-line VEGF TKI | Everolimus | Sorafenib | Y | Y | Y | 233 | 123 | 0.65(0.42, 0.99) | 0.75(0.53–1.07) |
Parket al.2012 | Medicalrecords froma singlecenter inSouth Korea | Failed first-line VEGF TKI | Everolimusandtemsirolimus | Sunitinibandsorafenib | Y | Yd | N | 42 | 41 | 1.71(0.86, 3.4) | 1.03(0.62–1.69)d |
Goreet al.2013 | Multicenter,Australia,Brazil,Canada,Europe,United States | Received first-line sunitinib in a randomized trial | Everolimus,temsirolimus,SirolimusandSGN-75 | Sunitinibandsorafenib | Y | N | Y | 42 | 171 | 1.05(0.71, 1.54) | N/A |
Harrisonet al.2012 | Multicenter,United States | Patients alive since January 2007 and diagnosed between January 1, 2007, and February 7, 2011 | Notspecified | Notspecified | N | N | Y | 33 | 32 | 3.13 (0.96, 10.22) | N/A |
Ruizet al.2013 | Single-institution,Spain | Received at least 1 line of target therapy between 2007 and 2011 | Everolimusandtemsirolimus | Sunitinib,sorafenib,bevacizumab,pazopanib,axitinibe,dovitinib | Y | N | N | 19 | 34 | 1.10(0.56, 2.17) | N/A |
Buschet al.2013 | Medicalrecords from2 centers inGermany | Failure of first-line VEGF TKI | Everolimusandtemsirolimus | Sunitinibandsorafenib | N | Yd | Y | 41 | 62 | 0.86(0.51, 1.44) | 0.76(0.43–1.35)d |
Iacovelliet al.2013 | Medicalrecords frommultiplecenters inItaly | Patients consecutively treated with 3 targeted therapies | Everolimusandtemsirolimus | Sunitinibandsorafenib | N | Y | Y | 95 | 152 | 2.59(1.59, 4.22) | N/A |
Elaidiet al.2013 | Medicalrecords from7 centers inEurope | Received VEGF TKI-VEGF TKI or VEGF TKI-mTORi | Everolimusandtemsirolimus | Sunitinib,sorafenib,pazopanib,axitinibe | Y | Y | Y | 123 | 118 | N/A | 1.56(1.11–2.22) |
Signorovitchet al.2013 | Chart review,multicenter,United States | Started second-line targeted therapy in 2010 or later | Everolimusandtemsirolimus | Sunitinib,sorafenib,pazopanib,axitinibe | Y | Y | Y | 138 | 79 | N/A | 0.74(0.48, 1.15) |
CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; mTORi, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor; N/A, not available; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; VEGF TKI, vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
OS HRs and 95% CIs were imputed for Harrison et al. 2012, Gore et al. 2013, and Ruiz et al. 2013.
PFS HRs and 95% CIs were imputed for Heng et al. 2012 and Busch et al. 2013.
Heng et al. 2012 used prospective data collection. However, the comparative analysis was performed retrospectively.
The PFS results for Busch et al. 2011, Heng et al. 2012, Park et al. 2012, and Busch et al. 2013 were unadjusted. Y in column adjustment refers to the OS results.
Only one patient received axitinib in Elaidi et al. 2013. The number of patients who received axitinib was not reported in Ruiz et al. 2013. The number receiving axitinib was n = 10 in Signorovitch et al. 2013 (personal communication).