Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 10;9(12):e114605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114605

Table 3. Antimicrobial activity and cytotoxic activity of parental and mutant peptides.

Items MICa (µM) MBCa (µM)
RI16 T9W T9I T9K T9F Amikacin T9W
E. coli 25922 128 64 128 128 64 0.125 >128
S. typhimurium 7731 128 128 256 256 128 0.5 >128
S. aureus 29213 128 128 256 128 128 1 >128
S. epidermidis 12228 32 64 32 128 32 0.125 >128
P. auruginosa 27853 256 2 256 128 256 1 2
P. auruginosa 10419 256 4 256 256 256 2 4
P. auruginosa 21625 256 4 256 256 256 16 4
P. auruginosa 21630 256 4 256 256 256 1 4
P. auruginosa LC 32 1 64 256 64 0.25 2
P. auruginosa LCCIb 256 2 256 256 256 8 4
P. auruginosa LCGEc 256 4 256 256 256 >1280 8
P. auruginosa LCCEd 256 4 256 256 256 8 8
Hemocytes (HC50 e) >256 >256 >256 >256 >256 >256 >256
Macrophage (LD50 f) >256 >256 >256 >256 >256 >256 >256
a

Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined as the lowest concentration of the peptides that inhibited bacteria growth, and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) was the concentration resulting in no bacterial growth.

b

A ciprofloxacin-resistant strain, which MIC for ciprofloxacin was above 512 µM.

c

A gentamincin-resistant strain, which MIC for gentamincin was above 512 µM.

d

A ceftazidime-resistant strain, which MIC for ceftazidime was above 512 µM.

e

HC50 value was taken as the concentration of peptide producing 50% hemolysis.

f

LD50 value was taken as the concentration of peptide producing 50% cell death.