Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Cardiol. 2014 Oct 23;115(1):62–68. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.09.055

Table 3. Relationship between renal parameters and primary outcome.

Unadjusted Analysis Adjusted Analysis*
Primary Composite HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
Baseline SCr 1.06 1.02 – 1.10 0.002 1.04 0.99 – 1.09 0.091
Baseline eGFR 1.20 1.11 – 1.30 < 0.001 1.11 1.02 – 1.21 0.017
Follow-Up SCr 1.05 1.02 – 1.08 0.002 1.05 1.00 – 1.10 0.040
Follow-Up eGFR 1.24 1.15 – 1.33 < 0.001 1.16 1.07 – 1.26 < 0.001
Stable SCr ref.
≥ 0.3 mg/dL ↓SCr 2.02 1.20 – 3.40 0.008 1.11 0.64 – 1.93 0.713
≥ 0.3 mg/dL ↑SCr 2.21 1.36 – 3.57 0.001 1.27 0.76 – 2.13 0.368
Stable eGFR ref.
≥ 25% ↑eGFR 1.32 0.81 – 2.15 0.269 0.88 0.53 – 1.47 0.624
≥ 25% ↓eGFR 1.71 1.04 – 2.81 0.035 0.92 0.53 – 1.58 0.759

Death HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P

Baseline SCr 1.03 0.95 - 1.13 0.424 0.96 0.85 - 1.07 0.433
Baseline eGFR 1.21 1.05 - 1.39 0.009 1.05 0.90 - 1.23 0.514
Follow-Up SCr 1.05 1.00 – 1.11 0.052 1.03 0.94 - 1.14 0.477
Follow-Up eGFR 1.33 1.17 - 1.52 < 0.001 1.23 1.04 - 1.44 0.014
Stable SCr ref.
≥ 0.3 mg/dL ↓SCr 1.92 0.72 - 5.14 0.192 0.81 0.28 - 2.31 0.689
≥ 0.3 mg/dL ↑SCr 3.1 1.41 - 6.82 0.005 1.48 0.61 - 3.57 0.387
Stable eGFR ref.
≥ 25% ↑eGFR 1.03 0.39 - 2.73 0.956 0.53 0.19 - 1.52 0.239
≥ 25% ↓eGFR 2.26 1.00 – 5.10 0.050 1.03 0.42 - 2.55 0.941
*

Cox proportional hazards model controlling for the following baseline characteristics: age, sex, race, ejection fraction, NYHA class, ischemic etiology, systolic blood pressure, long acting nitrate, hypertension, MLHFQ, diabetes, and loop diuretic.

Hazard ratio (HR) calculated per 0.3 mg/dL increments in serum creatinine (SCr) and per 10 mL/min decrements in eGFR.

Improved renal function, defined as a decrease in SCr ≥ 0.3 mg/dL; and an increase in eGFR ≥ 25%.

Worsening renal function, defined as an increase in SCr ≥ 0.3 mg/dL; and a decrease in eGFR ≥ 25%.