Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 25;2014:421423. doi: 10.1155/2014/421423

Table 2.

Outcome data from the included studies: weight or BMI, body fat (BF) % or fat mass (FM), summary of weight or BMI and body fat measures, and attrition.

Study (reference number) Baseline average weight (kg) ± SD and/or BMI (kg/m2) ± SD (range) Baseline average % fat and/or fat mass (kg) ± SD (range) Follow-up average weight (kg) ± SD and/or BMI (kg/m2) ± SD (range) Follow-up average % fat and/or fat mass (kg) ± SD (range) Average weight (kg) ± SD and/or BMI (kg/m2) change ± SD (range) Average % fat or fat mass (kg) change ± SD (range or CI) Summary/agreement of measures Attrition (if reported)
[27] Weight: 83.6 ± 8.6
BMI: 31.4 ± 3.7
% BF: 46.9 ± 3.6
FM: 39.3 ± 6.1
Not reported % BF: 41.9 ± 4.3 Weight loss:
−8.3 ± 3.1
% BF: −5.0 ± 3.9
FM: −7.4 ± 3.7
Weight and fat measures decreased significantly. Weight loss mostly accounted for by FM.

[28] Weight: 79.8 ± 11.8
BMI: 29.1 ± 4.8
% BF: 39.3 ± 7.5 Weight: 62.5 ± 8.3
BMI: ±24 ± 3.5
% BF: 29.3 ± 7.0 Weight loss:
−17.3 (CI: 15.7–18.9)
(=−22%)
BMI: −5.1 (CI: −3.8–−6.4)
(=−17.5%)
% BF: −10.0 (CI: 9–11) All weight or BMI and fat measures decreased significantly.

[29] Weight: 87.2 ± 12.6
BMI: 29.3 ± 1.6
% BF: 35.5 ± 6.0 Not reported Not reported Weight loss:
−6.1 ± 0.6 (=−7.1%)
FM: −5.9 ± 0.6 Weight and fat measures decreased significantly. Weight loss mostly accounted for by FM. 20%

[30] Weight: 96.4 ± 16.0
BMI: 36.4 ± 5.5
% BF: 46.2 ± 5.6
FM: 45.8 ± 12.3
Weight: 88.6 ± 15.7
BMI: 33.6 ± 5.3
% BF: 44.5 ± 6.1
FM: 39.6 ± 11.8
Weight loss:
−7.8 ± 15.9
BMI: −2.8 ± 5.4
% BF: −2.4 ± 5.8
FM: −3.6 ± 12.0
Weight or BMI and fat measures decreased significantly. 25%

[31] Weight: 76.9 ± 6.6
BMI: 28.5 ± 1.5
% BF: ±44.1 ± 3.8
FM: 34.1 ± 5.0
Weight: 64.3 ± 6.1
BMI: 23.8 ± 1.1
% BF: 33.9 ± 4.5
FM: 22.0 ± 4.6
Weight loss:
−12.5 ± 2.2
BMI: −4.7 ± 1.3
% BF: −10.2 ± 4.1
FM: −12.1 ± 4.8
Weight or BMI and fat measures decreased significantly. Weight loss mostly accounted for by FM.

[32] Weight: 103.5 ± 14.4
BMI: 36.1 ± 3.5
FM: 40.4 ± 7.8 Not reported Not reported Weight loss:
−7.4 (CI: −9.1–−5.6)
FM: −3.8 (−5.0–−2.6) Weight and fat measures decreased (not noted whether differences were significant). 32%

[33] (aerobic treatment arm) Weight: 96.0 ± 23.0 FM: 38.4 ± 12.5 Weight: 86.4 ± 19.8 FM: 31.2 ± 11.0 Weight loss:
−9.6 ± 4.5
FM: −7.2 ± 3.0 Weight or BMI and fat measures decreased significantly. Weight loss mostly accounted for by FM.

[34] Weight: 104.5 ± 5.5
BMI: 39.5 ± 7.0
FM: 44.0 ± 2.5 Weight: 97.0 ± 3.5 FM: 36.0 ± 2.0 Weight loss: −7.5 ± 4.5 FM: −8.0 ± 2.2 (=−17.2%) Weight or BMI and fat measures decreased significantly. Weight loss mostly accounted for by FM.

[35] Weight: 87.7 ± 22.6
BMI: 32.2 ± 7.8
% BF: 38.4 ± 6.0 Weight: 74.8 ± 21.4 % BF: 30.3 ± 7.1 Weight loss:
−8.2 ± 0.7
% BF: −8.1 ± 6.5 Weight and fat measures decreased significantly. Weight loss mostly accounted for by FM (91% loss was fat). 28%

[36] Weight: 81.9 ± 10.5
BMI: 27.5 ± 1.6
% BF: 32.6 ± 7.6 Not reported Not reported Weight loss: −8.0 ± 2.0 (=−10.0%) % BF: −25% change in % BF ± 3 Weight and fat measures decreased significantly. 4%

[37] Weight: 100.2 % BF: 45.0% Weight: 92.6 % BF: 41.8 Weight loss:
−7.6
% BF: −3.2 Weight and fat measures decreased significantly. Diet and PA group lost significantly more fat and significantly less fat-free mass than non-PA subjects.

[38] BMI: 30.5 ± 3 % BF: 43.9 ± 1.1 Not reported % BF: 38.5 ± 1.3 Weight loss:
−8.6 ± 0.9
% BF: −4.5%
FM: −7.0 ± 0.6
Diet + PA group lost significantly more weight than non-PA group; diet + PA group had significantly greater decrease in % BF than non-PA group. PA: 86% of weight loss from fat versus 73% f/non-PA group 20%

[39] Weight: 85.2 kg ± 2.1
BMI: 31.6 ± 0.6
% BF: 40.2 ± 0.7
FM: 34.5 ± 1.3
Not reported Not reported Weight loss:
−4.3 ± 0.7
BMI decrease:
−1.8 ± 0.3
% BF: −1.3 ± 0.2
FM: −1.7 ± 0.5
Weight or BMI and fat measures decreased significantly. Fat loss more significant than weight loss. 10% at halfway point of study

[40] Weight: 90.4 ± 2.9
BMI: 32.4 ± 1.3
% BF: 41.6 ± 1.5
FM: 38.0 ± 2.9
Not reported Not reported Weight loss:
−9.1 ± 1.1
FM: −7.8 ± 0.82 Weight and fat measures decreased significantly. Weight loss mostly accounted for by FM: percentage of weight lost as fat significantly different for diet + PA group (88.6 ± 5.1%), versus diet only group (77.1 ± 4.0%).

[41] Weight: 95.7 ± 16.6
BMI: 35.3 ± 5.7
FM: 39.3 ± 10 Not reported Not reported Weight loss:
−5.4 (−7.0–3.0)
% BF: −1.9% (−2.6–−1.3)
FM: −3.3 (−4.0–−2.0)
Weight and fat measures decreased significantly. 33%

[42] Weight: 94.3 kg ± 16.0
BMI: 35.7 ± 6.0
% BF: 45.1 ± 4.2
FM: 40.0 ± 9.7
Weight: 90.1 ± 15.6 % BF: 43.2 ± 4.7
FM: 36.6 ± 9.2
Weight loss:
−4.2 ± 15.8
% BF: −1.9 ± 4.5
FM: −3.4 ± 9.5
Weight and fat measures decreased significantly. Weight loss mostly accounted for by FM. 35%

[43] Weight: 96.5 ± 20.2
BMI: 35.3 ± 6.5
% BF: 41.9 ± 9.4
FM: 40.3 ± 12.8
Weight: 93.3 ± 21.2
BMI: 34.2 ± 6.6
% BF: 41.2 ± 8.9
FM: 38.6 ± 12.6
Weight loss: −2.9 ± 20.7
BMI: −1.1 ± 6.5
% BF: −0.7 ± 9.2
FM: −0.9 ± 12.7 (=−2.3%)
Weight decreased significantly; body FM was “borderline significant” (P = 0.053). BMI and % BF declined more in intervention group than control, no significant differences between groups.

[44] (diet + aerobic ex.) Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Weight loss:
−6.8
% BF: −8.0 Weight and fat measures decreased significantly.

[44] (diet + aerobic + strength) Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Weight loss:
−7.0
% BF: −4.3 Results same as above. Weight loss through diet was not altered by aerobic or aerobic + strength training, but diet + PA increased muscle during weight loss.

[45] Weight: 89.2 ± 12.0
BMI: 33.1 ± 4.0
% BF: 44.1 ± 4.0
FM: 36.8 ± 8.0
Weight: 86.1 ± 11.0
BMI: 32.0 ± 4.0
% BF: 43.1 ± 5.0
FM: 34.5 ± 7.0
Weight loss:
−3.1 ± 11.5
BMI:
−1.1 ± 4.0
% BF: −1.0 ± 4.5
FM: −2.3 ± 7.5
Weight or BMI and fat measures decreased significantly. Weight loss mostly accounted for by FM.

[46] Weight: 82.9 ± 3.6
BMI: 30.8 ± 1.5
FM: 38.6 ± 2.9 Weight: 74.7 ± 3.3 FM: 31.4 ± 2.6 Weight loss:
−8.2 ± 3.4
FM: −7.2 ± 0.7 Weight or BMI and fat measures decreased significantly. Weight loss mostly accounted for by FM. More fat loss associated with high protein diet + PA

[47] Weight: 106.0 ± 25.6 % BF: 44.4 ± 5.6
FM: 47.6 ± 15.2
Weight: 90.7 ± 21.6 % BF: 35.3 ± 7.3
FM: 32.7 ± 12.7
Weight loss:
−15.3 ± 1.1
% BF: −9.1 ± 0.5
FM: −14.9 ± 0.8
Weight and fat measures decreased significantly. Weight loss mostly accounted for by FM.

[48] Weight: 88.8 ± 3.3
BMI: 31.8 ± 0.7
% BF: 45.1 ± 1.3
FM: 40.2 ± 2.1
Weight: 81.7 ± 2.9
BMI: 28.0 ± 1.5
% BF: 39.7 ± 1.6
FM: 32.6 ± 1.9
Weight loss:
−7.1 ± 3.1 (=−8%)
BMI: −3.8 ± 1.1 (=−12%)
% BF: −5.4 ±
1.4
FM: −7.6 ± 2.0
Weight and fat measures decreased significantly. Weight loss mostly accounted for by FM. Diet + PA group lost more fat than PA only group. 48.8% in diet + PA group

[49] Weight: 86.5 ± 12.0
BMI: 32.5 ± 5.0
FM: 42.0 ± 1.1 Not reported FM: 36.8 ± 1.1 Weight loss:
−7.6 ± 0.4
FM: −5.1 ± 0.5 Weight and fat measures decreased significantly. Weight loss mostly accounted for by FM. 16%

[50] Weight: 92.1 ± 8.8 % BF: 44.0 ± 3.2 Not reported Not reported Weight loss:
−10.5 ± 3.3
FM: −8.8 ± 2.1 Weight and fat measures decreased significantly. Weight loss mostly accounted for by FM. 25%

[51] Weight: 78.1 ± 10.3 FM: 31.9 ± 6.2 Not reported Not reported Weight loss:
−10.3 ± 3.0
FM: −9.6 ± 2.7 Weight and fat measures decreased significantly. Weight loss mostly accounted for by FM. Diet + PA group lost no lean tissue mass. 2.5%

[52] Weight: 101.9 ± 11.2
BMI: 32.6 ± 2.5
% BF: 33.5 ± 4.2
FM: 34.2 ± 6.1
Weight: 86.7 ± 9.3
BMI: 27.8 ± 2.5
% BF: 25.0 ± 5.0
FM: 21.7 ± 5.2
Weight loss:
−15.2 ± 6.3
BMI: −4.8 ± 2.5
% BF: −8.5 ± 4.7
FM: −12.5 ± 5.6
Weight or BMI and fat measures decreased significantly. Weight loss mostly accounted for by FM.

[53] Weight: 94.5 ± 11.7
BMI: 33.1 ± 3.4
Not reported Not reported Not reported Weight loss:
−6.6 ± 6.4
BMI: −2.3 ± 2.1
% BF: −4.0 ± 4.1 Weight or BMI and fat measures decreased significantly. 23%

[54] Weight: 95.7 ± 18.0
BMI: 33.9 ± 5.3
Not reported Not reported Not reported Weight loss:
−6.5 (CI: −4.6–−8.4)
% BF: −2.8 (CI: −1.9–−3.9)
FM: −4.8 (CI:−3.2–−6.3)
Weight or BMI and fat measures decreased significantly. Weight loss mostly accounted for by FM. 24–43% (different groups)

Note: outcome data are presented for the longest follow-up time available. CI: 95% confidence interval. When body weight or BMI and/or body composition outcome measures were not reported, the data were not imputed as long as the change measures were intact and reported; in those cases “not reported” is presented. Significance indicates differences compared to baseline values and to diet only/control group(s) when indicated.